Jump to Navigation
Blog

Wisconsin Fraud, Criminal and White-Collar Criminal Investigation Blog

Are your trees keeping your neighborhood safe?

There are many myths when it comes to the topic of crime and crime prevention. For example, one of the more pervasive myths has always been that the presence of too many trees, bushes or other greenery in urban areas results in higher crime rates. However, a recently released study by researchers at Temple University actually serves to dispel this myth once and for all.

In the study, published in Landscape and Urban Planning, researchers gathered comprehensive crime data for areas throughout the city and compared it with satellite photographs of the same areas outlining its greenery.

Here, they determined that those areas with more well-maintained greenery had much lower overall crime rates than areas with lesser amounts of greenery. Even more fascinating, they discovered that this trend was evident in all areas under study regardless of such factors as wealth or education.

Global ATM heist results in theft of $45M

If you were to hear a story about a small group of people using sophisticated computer technology and a well-organized plan of action to take millions of dollars from unsuspecting parties around the globe, there is a very good chance that you would think somebody was just rehashing the plot of the latest movie of the week. As it turns out, this was real life as federal law enforcement officials charged eight people for their roles in a $45 million global ATM heist last week.

According to federal prosecutors, the plan was originally hatched overseas, where computer hackers -- whose identity remains unknown -- launched a clandestine cyber attack on processors that manage prepaid debit card transactions for two major banks in Oman and the United Arab Emirates, stealing secret financial data.

From there, federal prosecutors allege that the stolen financial data was encoded onto plastic ATM cards that had the withdrawal limits eliminated. These cards were then sent to waiting crews in 27 different countries, including the United States.

Ad hoc science experiment leaves teen facing charges, expulsion

science experiement.jpgThe uptick in school-related violence over the last decade has lead many school districts around the nation to implement additional safety protocols and more stringent codes of conduct outlining so-called zero tolerance rules. While many have praised these rules as being absolutely necessary to protect students and staff, others have criticized them for perhaps being too rigid and unfair to students.

To illustrate, consider a recent case out of Florida where a teenager is now facing both serious felony charges and expulsion from her high school for attempting what a friend described as "a science fair experiment."

The incident in question occurred back on the morning of April 22, when a 16-year-old student at Bartow High School conducted an unsupervised and makeshift science experiment on school grounds prior to the start of classes. Here, the student mixed aluminum foil and toilet bowl cleaner in a small plastic water bottle, thinking it would just cause some smoke. However, the mixing of the two substances not only caused smoke, but also a minor explosion.

Report finds crime alerts are going ignored at many UW campuses

UW Madison.jpgIn an attempt to help prevent crime, college campuses across the nation have implemented new emergency notification systems designed to deliver both warnings and advice to students, faculty and staff instantaneously via emails, automated phone calls, public address system announcements and, of course, text messages.

In fact, security officials at colleges have discovered that text messages have proven time and time again to be the most effective way of communicating with and eliciting responses from recipients -- particularly the student body.

Much of this likely has to do with the fact that today's young people are more reliant on their smart phones than ever, constantly checking to see if they have received any communications.

"The best way to respond (to an emergency) is to have the most instantaneous message delivery on a college campus, and that by far is text messaging," said Michael Hanley, director of the Ball State University's Institute for Mobile Media Research.

Interestingly, a recent review by the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism revealed that the participation rate for text message alerts at the University of Wisconsin's 13 four-year campuses is wholly inadequate.

Bill would crack down on those who badger state lawmakers

WI State Capital 2.jpgThere is no question that politics can inspire people to do great things from organizing rallies and collecting signatures to writing letters to politicians or even considering a run for office. However, there is also no question that politics can be prove to be incredibly divisive, and sometimes cause people to engage in inappropriate or even criminal conduct.

Here in Wisconsin, we are very familiar with how heated a political issue can become. Back in 2011, our state was the scene of large-scale protests after Gov. Scott Walker signed a law that essentially ended collective bargaining rights for the vast majority of public workers.

During this tumultuous time, many state legislators claimed to have had less than pleasant encounters with protestors, including angry confrontations in the hallways of the Capitol and harassing phone calls at night.

In response to this and other types of questionable conduct concerning hot-button issues, state legislators have introduced a bipartisan bill that is designed to deter people from intimidating, harassing or harming politicians and their families.

State DOC audit reveals staggering costs of proposed OWI bills

OWI Bill.jpgState Representative Jim Ott (R-Mequon) and State Senator Alberta Darling (R- River Hills) made headlines earlier this legislative session when they each introduced an identical set of six drunk driving bills in their respective chambers calling for much harsher consequences for those caught operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated in Wisconsin.

To recap, the six bills would do the following:

  • Senate Bill 58/Assembly Bill 68 -- Criminalize first-offense OWI for those caught driving with a blood alcohol content of .15 or higher (Under current law, all first-offense OWIs are treated as civil matters like a speeding ticket or seat belt violation)
  • Senate Bill 60/Assembly Bill 71 -- Make third-offense OWI a felony regardless of the timeframe involved and increase incarceration, probation and fines for fourth offense and higher OWI 
  • Senate Bill 57/Assembly Bill 67 -- Mandate that all first-time offenders must appear in court regardless of whether it's treated as a civil or criminal offense
  • Senate Bill 61/Assembly Bill 72 -- Mandate that judges must seize the automobiles of anyone convicted of third-offense OWI or higher
  • Senate Bill 59/Assembly Bill 70 -- Introduce a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years for those convicted of causing drunk driving-related fatalities
  • Senate Bill 56/Assembly Bill 69 -- Introduce a mandatory minimum sentence of up to three years for those convicted of causing drunk driving-related injuries

Interestingly, the state Department of Corrections recently released a series of cost and personnel projections concerning these six bills and the results were nothing less than shocking

SCOTUS examines need for search warrants in DUI blood tests - II

blood test.jpgThe Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the trial court to suppress the blood test results. Here, the justices relied on a 1966 Supreme Court case, Schmerber v. California, which held that warrantless blood tests of DUI suspects are permissible where the officer "might reasonably have believed that he was confronted with an emergency, in which the delay necessary to obtain the warrant, under the circumstances, threatened 'the destruction of evidence.'"

Here, the court reasoned that the officer who pulled over McNeely was threatened with no such emergency, only the natural dissipation of alcohol levels in the human body, something that occurs in every DUI case. Accordingly, the court held that the nonconsensual warrantless blood draw violated McNeely's Fourth Amendment rights.

SCOTUS examines need for search warrants in DUI blood tests - I

Last month, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a fascinating decision in Missouri v. McNeely, a case examining drunk driving arrests, non-consensual blood testing and the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement exception.

According to the facts of the case, a police officer spotted a truck driven by Tyler McNeely speeding and crossing the centerline of a Missouri highway just after 2 a.m. The officer proceeded to initiate a traffic stop and noticed that McNeely bore certain signs of intoxication, including slurred speech, bloodshot eyes and the smell of alcohol on his breath.

McNeely informed the officer that he has consumed "a couple of beers" at a local bar and was unsteady after exiting the truck. After failing a field sobriety test and refusing to submit to a breath test, he was placed under arrest.

The officer intended to take him back to the station, but rerouted to a hospital after McNeely indicated in the squad car that he would not submit to another breath test. Here, a blood test was performed even though McNeely refused to provide his consent and the officer failed to secure a search warrant.

Wisconsin seeing more counties introduce treatment court programs

courthouse.jpgLast week, nearly 300 people -- including judges, prosecutors, criminal defense attorneys, social workers and law enforcement personnel -- gathered in Appleton for the annual meeting of the Wisconsin Association of Treatment Court Professionals. For those unfamiliar with this group, its stated purpose is to "reduce substance abuse, crime and recidivism by promoting and advocating the establishment and funding of treatment courts."

Interestingly, the group indicated at this meeting that its representatives will be heading to the Capitol next month in an attempt to raise awareness among lawmakers about the efficacy of the state's treatment court programs and the need for additional funding.

"We'd love to see a court in every county, but it takes a lot of time and a lot of resources to make it happen," said Jenny Ingram, president of the association.

While most people might not realize it, Wisconsin actually has a rather extensive network of treatment courts with over 50 programs running in 28 counties and ten additional programs in the planning stages. The first treatment court program was started in Dane County in 1996 and the idea slowly gained momentum through the mid-2000s.

State lawmakers advance food stamp fraud bill

Gavel.jpgBack in 2010, the state's Joint Legislative Audit Committee formally requested that investigators perform an audit of the state's FoodShare program amid reports of widespread fraudulent activity.

For those unfamiliar with FoodShare, it is essentially Wisconsin's food stamp program, which utilizes federal funds to help qualifying low-income individuals and families purchase the necessary foodstuffs.

Here the audit revealed the following:

  • Prison inmates and those who violated their parole or probation illegally received almost $2 million in FoodShare benefits
  • There were 334 separate incidents during the 2010-2011 fiscal year in which FoodShare benefit cards -- similar to debit cards -- were used in both Wisconsin and in neighboring states to make purchases on the same day

In the years since the audit was completed, state officials have struggled to combat the growing problem of FoodShare participants selling their cards for cash only to later apply for free replacements, or selling them to retailers who purchase them for less than their value only to turn around and redeem the benefit dollars for their full cash value.

Do You Have a Case?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Office Location
The Best Lawyers in America SuperLawyers

Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown, LLP
TWO PLAZA EAST, SUITE 1170
330 EAST KILBOURN AVENUE
MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53202
P: 414-271-1440
F: 414-271-7680
E-mail the Firm